Hi;

Thanks... I solved this problem also... thank you Alain...
Here is my iptables -L result...
**********************************************************************************************************************
# iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination
DROP       tcp  --  anywhere             192.168.10.13       tcp dpt:ssh
DROP       tcp  --  anywhere             192.168.10.13       tcp
dpt:ncube-lm

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination
ACCEPT     all  --  anywhere             anywhere

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination
**********************************************************************************************************************

how can I change FORWARD policy to accepting only http, https?

Thanks for all...

sincerely yours...




2008/1/29, Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Jan 28, 2008 8:45 AM, Tolun ARDAHANLI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi guys;
> >
> > OK let me explain like this...
> >
> > We had a problem with our General network administration and our General
> > network cant be managed so well(Cause of our IT manager is not so good
> about
> > administration on our network). that is why i thing that our
> department's
> > users must be separated from General LAN(Cause of our Generel LAN
> effected
> > to our working performance). After that we separated our users to
> another
> > subnet(192.168.1.xxx).
> >
> > Right now all of my departments member joined to our server(Centos5.1)
> and
> > all of them joins to internet over our server... We solved the problem
> > together if you read all mails in this subject...
> >
> > I thing Only problem is that "our members must not to reach server's
> > internet side ip(192.168.10.13)" am i right for that?
>
> 192.168.10.13 and 192.168.1.100 refer the same centos server! Right ?
> Then this is the default behavior for a linux to answer requests on
> one interface,
> even if the request is for one address on another interface.
>
> >  and
> > other question is about "how can i stop the ssh service for the internet
> > side ip(192.168.10.13)"?
>
> 2 possibilities
>
> using iptables to reject/drop any packet coming from eth1 (or eth0)
>
> iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp -i eth1 --dport 22 -j DROP
>
> Or force sshd to bind only to the internal address, this is
> ListenAddress in sshd config: man sshd_config for more
>
> Regards.
>
> >
> > I am not a network engineer... I am just a software engineer... I am
> trying
> > to do our project on Linux systems... I cant focus so deeply on network
> > administration... Only I can do your advise... not else... Cause I can't
> > spent time for that(I want but I can't)..:(
> >
> > I hope that I explained it well...;)...
> >
> > thanks to all...
> >
> > sincerely yours...
> >
> >
> >
> > 2008/1/25, Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On Jan 25, 2008 9:37 AM, Tolun ARDAHANLI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > Thank you for all really I solved the forward/ip sharing problem...
> > > >
> > > > But I see there is other problem with that like this;
> > > >
> > > > This is my network structure now;
> > > > LAN(there are 3machines):
> > > > start ip:192.168.1.10
> > > >  end ip: 192.168.1.12
> > > > gateway address of users: 192.168.1.100 (my server's LAN side ip
> > address)
> > > > LAN side Server ip: 192.168.1.100
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > WAN(this ip comes from behind of swicth. the switch is behind of
> > firewall
> > > > and firewall is behind of router):
> > > >  WAN side Server ip: 192.168.10.13
> > > > gateway address of Server:192.168.10.1
> > > >
> > > > And here is the problem i thing;
> > > > The users from inside(LAN) can reach from server's WAN side
> > > > ip(192.168.10.13) and they can ping it and they can take a services
> > which is
> > > > for LAN services(like ssh...etc).
> > > >
> > > > I agree that pinging from LAN to gateway address(192.168.10.1). But
> I
> > cant
> > > > agree that pinging to server's WAN address(192.168.10.13). Do I
> thing
> > wrong
> > > > at this point? and last question is about how can I close/stop
> services
> > for
> > > > WAN side?
> > >
> > > I dont understant!
> > > WHO is (OR CANNOT) pinging 192.168.10.13 or can (OR CANNOT) access the
> > > service ? LAN or WAN ?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > thanks to all of you...
> > > >
> > > > sincerely yours...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2008/1/24, Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > > On Jan 24, 2008 5:42 AM, Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > On Jan 23, 2008 9:43 AM, Tolun ARDAHANLI
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi again to everyone;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Guys your mails are very nice... i liked all of them...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > let me give you about my system and my need(sorry for writing
> > these
> > > > late)...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've got an IBM x3650 server which is open 7d/24h. It has got
> 2
> > > > ethernet
> > > > > > > card. I would like to connect my LAN to WAN over this
> machine...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LAN(there are 3machines):
> > > > > > > start ip:192.168.10.10
> > > > > > > end ip: 192.168.10.12
> > > > > > > gateway address of users:192.168.10.13(my server's LAN side ip
> > > > address)
> > > > > > > LAN side Server ip: 192.168.10.13
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > WAN(this ip comes from behind of swicth. the switch is behind
> of
> > > > firewall
> > > > > > > and firewall is behind of router):
> > > > > > > WAN side Server ip: 10.10.1.223
> > > > > > > gateway address of Server:10.10.1.111
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > this is my network chances...:( i cant change them cause our
> > company
> > > > has
> > > > > > > strong rules for these addresses... I want to share my WAN
> side ip
> > > > address
> > > > > > > to my LAN side...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How can I do that on my CENTos installed server?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks a lot to everybody...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The short way, supposing your wan is secure and your wan
> interface
> > is
> > > > eth1:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Disable any firewall rules on your centos,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > service iptables stop
> > > > > > chkconfig iptables off
> > > > > >
> > > > > > try these commands, and if this is working put them in your
> > > > /etc/init.d/rc.local
> > > > > >
> > > > > > # enable forwarding of packet between all interfaces
> > > > > > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > > > > > # config masquerading, any packet leaving eth1 will be
> masqueraded,
> > > > > > taking eth1 address for source address.
> > > > > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE
> > > > >
> > > > > Another interesting way, is to setup only routing on your centos,
> and
> > > > > add (ask your network manager) the route
> > > > > of your internal network (I guess 192.168.10.8/29 through
> > > > > 192.168.10.13 ) on your firewall and maybe a similar one
> > > > > on your router if the firewall is not doing NAT.
> > > > > Then your firewall administrator can control the access to any of
> your
> > > > > internal machines or make some of them reachable
> > > > > from outside if for example you want to have a web server or an
> email
> > > > > server (this is not a good idea, but you get the idea).
> > > > > All of this without chnaging anything more on your centos router.
> > > > >
> > > > > To route packet only,  without doing NAT (aka MASQUERADING or
> > HIDE-NAT)
> > > > > just use
> > > > > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2008/1/22, Dennis McLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have an IPcop box setup at work. Using squidguard to keep
> > > > customers from
> > > > > > > > surfing porn while they are in our waiting room. (On a
> > completely
> > > > separate
> > > > > > > > DSL connection..)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have an Astaro Security Gateway setup at home (on a Dell
> p3
> > > > precision
> > > > > > > > 220). Free home license, do FAR more than your typical
> broadband
> > > > router.
> > > > > > > Not
> > > > > > > > a small learning curve, though. Wireless is through a D-link
> > > > DWL-7100(I
> > > > > > > > think) access point in the attic.
> > > > > > > > I have a Linksys wrt54g (original version) with openWRT, but
> > it's
> > > > just
> > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > for backup.....
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Any of the above will accomplish your goal...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > On
> > > > > > > Behalf
> > > > > > > > Of Alain Spineux
> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:52 AM
> > > > > > > > To: CentOS mailing list
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] How can i share my WAN ip to my LAN?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Jan 22, 2008 3:17 PM, William L. Maltby <
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 14:49 +0100, Alain Spineux wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Jan 22, 2008 8:46 AM, Tolun ARDAHANLI <
> > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi everybody...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > How can I share my WAN ip to my LAN? How can I do that
> I
> > > > really
> > > > > > > > > > > dont know...:( I am using linux long time ago but this
> > kind I
> > > > > > > > > > > would like to do newly...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Buy a small router/modem, ask your ISP for suggestions.
> > > > > > > > > > This is cheap (<100$), no need to keep your computer
> always
> > > > turned
> > > > > > > > > > on, very easy to configure if you nead more features
> (port
> > > > > > > > > > forwarding for skype, games, p2p, ....), have some
> builtint
> > > > feature
> > > > > > > > > > (dhcp, DNS proxy). Also think about wireless ......
> > > > > > > > > > This is probably more secure, not because centos/linux
> is
> > not,
> > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > because you dont know what you are doing.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Of course this is less fun
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Well, I wasn't going to suggest, but since the topic of
> > > > alternatives
> > > > > > > > > is open...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Of course the main idea is to avoid to have a non firewall
> > dedicated
> > > > linux
> > > > > > > > (like centos is) configured by someone without to much
> network
> > > > knowledge
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > in front of Internet.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If you have an older available computer laying around,
> check
> > out
> > > > IPCop
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >     http://www.ipcop.org/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > free, has lots of features, runs reliably, I've been on it
> for
> > > > years,
> > > > > > > > > as have others on this list. Biggest gripe I have is docs
> > could be
> > > > a
> > > > > > > > > little better - they tend to not get updated to stay up
> with
> > the
> > > > > > > software.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Can anybody help me about IP sharing in Centos?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > thanks alot...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Tolun ARDAHANLI
> > > > > > > > > > > Bilgisayar Muhendisi
> > > > > > > > > > > E-posta: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > Icq:326600
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > ----------
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Tolun ARDAHANLI
> > > > > > > > > > > Computer Engineer
> > > > > > > > > > > E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > Icq:326600
> > > > > > > > > > ><snip sig stuff>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > HTH
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Bill
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > CentOS mailing list
> > > > > > > > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > > > > > > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Alain Spineux
> > > > > > > > aspineux gmail com
> > > > > > > > May the sources be with you
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > CentOS mailing list
> > > > > > > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > > > > > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > CentOS mailing list
> > > > > > > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > > > > > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tolun ARDAHANLI
> > > > > > > Bilgisayar Muhendisi
> > > > > > > E-posta:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Icq:326600
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tolun ARDAHANLI
> > > > > > > Computer Engineer
> > > > > > > E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Icq:326600
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > CentOS mailing list
> > > > > > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > > > > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Alain Spineux
> > > > > > aspineux gmail com
> > > > > > May the sources be with you
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Alain Spineux
> > > > > aspineux gmail com
> > > > > May the sources be with you
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > CentOS mailing list
> > > > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Tolun ARDAHANLI
> > > > Bilgisayar Muhendisi
> > > > E-posta:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Icq:326600
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Tolun ARDAHANLI
> > > > Computer Engineer
> > > > E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Icq:326600
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > CentOS mailing list
> > > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alain Spineux
> > > aspineux gmail com
> > > May the sources be with you
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CentOS mailing list
> > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tolun ARDAHANLI
> > Bilgisayar Muhendisi
> > E-posta:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  Icq:326600
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Tolun ARDAHANLI
> > Computer Engineer
> > E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  Icq:326600
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alain Spineux
> aspineux gmail com
> May the sources be with you
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
Tolun ARDAHANLI
Bilgisayar Muhendisi
E-posta:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Icq:326600

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tolun ARDAHANLI
Computer Engineer
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Icq:326600
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to