On 2017-03-03 14:14, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article > <cagkb5vfxkjcbpqwupuzg0xp8_gtgv+55+yrzf8vdf0maio9...@mail.gmail.com>, > James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 3 March 2017 at 11:47, James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>>> >>>>> You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would >>>>> seem rather irresponsible... >>>> Mirroring EPEL makes sense well before this point, as they don't keep old >>>> versions of packages online either AFAIK. >>>> >>>> jh >>> Indeed they aren't kept ... and since there hasn't been an EOL of EPEL >>> before I honestly have no idea ... I've asked on the epel-devel >>> mailing list as to whether it'll move to archive like old fedora >>> releases do. >> My mistake - I forgot there was an EPEL4 in the mists of time .. so >> the last version of the repo is likely to end up here: >> >> http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/ > Cool, thanks! > > Tony I am mirroring the EPEL from official mirrors and the EPEL4 content is stills there: 1.9G pub/mirrors/epel/4 7.3G pub/mirrors/epel/5 15G pub/mirrors/epel/6 16G pub/mirrors/epel/7
//Zdenek _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
