On 12/28/18 6:38 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > I tried to compile aeskulap on Centos 7.6 by using the commands ./configure > > followed by > > make which resulted in the following errors : > > Attempting to build this way is next to pointless and will likely show > you errors completely unrelated to why the package won't properly build. > > > make[4]: *** [dimoimg.o] Error 1 > > make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2- > > beta1/dcmtk/dcmimgle/libsrc' > > make[3]: *** [libsrc-all] Error 2 > > make[3]: Leaving directory > > `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1/dcmtk/dcmimgle' > > make[2]: *** [dcmimgle-libsrc-all] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory > > `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1/dcmtk' > > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1' > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > ...and even if you were building it correctly you completely skipped the > actual errors here. What you've shown can't be used in any significant > way to help. > > > I downloaded the source files from : > > > > http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el7/SRPMS/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.17beta1.el7.nux.src.rpm > > As you've already stated and shown here this is a package from a > 3rd-party repo, and as such is not supported by the CentOS project. If > Nux can't help you then I suggest you look for the package elsewhere or > try to (properly) build it yourself. Unfortunately neither of these > options is supported here.
I was going to give it a shot but there are three build dependencies not part of CentOS 7 / EPEL 7 dcmtk-devel gconfmm26-devel libglademm24-devel When that starts to happen, it often results in needing additional dependencies to build those, etc. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alice, Thanks much for trying. Your observation was the same as mine. I installed the above dependencies without a problem, they were all in the repops. After I installed them it still failed to compile with the final result being the errors that I posted earlier. I am not wanting to convert these desktops to Fedora 29, but at least I have a path for what is needed. If any of the other users on the list have ideas of what has happened to Centos 7.6 I would surely appreciate a solution. Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos