On 25/07/2019 20:39, John Pierce wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:32 AM hw <h...@gc-24.de> wrote:

I can't help it when the primary name server goes down because the UPS
fails
the self test and tells the server it has 2 minutes or so left in wich case
the server figures it needs to shut down.  I wanted better UPSs ...

critical infrastructure servers should have redudant PSUs, on seperate UPSs.

Separate DNS servers must be on a different subnet according to RFC2182 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2182):

Secondary servers must be placed at both topologically and
   geographically dispersed locations on the Internet, to minimise the
   likelihood of a single failure disabling all of them.

I know that UPSs are physical, and subnets are logical, but the reasoning behind the requirement is due to having to be on a different infrastructure.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to