Hi, > "Nicolas Kovacs" <i...@microlinux.fr> wrote: > >> >> https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877 > > The article states that CentOS will now be "upstream" of RHEL instead > of "downstream". > > This is strange to me. I never thought CentOS was upstream or > downstream of RHEL; I always thought it *was* RHEL -- perhaps a little > delayed, but that's not the same as being "downstream".
But that's also part of the problem for Red Hat, at least that's my impression and I can understand why. > It's also clear that Red Hat didn't understand the importance of the > 10-year support period. I _could_ probably live with CentOS Stream for the benefit of all even if it's not 100% identical to RHEL but as stable as it, _but_, only if they extend the maintenance period to the same 10 years analog to RHEL. @Red Hat, do you hear our voices? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
