On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:24:03AM -0600, Tom Bishop wrote: > I know you and other RHEL folks keep saying this about cashing out etc, but > they could have kept stream and Centos stable at the same time but chose > not to. Ya know, if it walks like a duck and quacks as a duck...who knows > maybe this goes down as one of the best decisions ever for RH but I think > its going to hurt them in more ways then they ever thought about.
As I've also said before, I have no special insight into how RH and the CentOS board came to this timeline, but I _am_ inclined to believe that the motivation is the one that they give: they want to focus attention and resources. Look at CloudLinux saying that they plan to invest a million dollars a year into doing their rebuild. It's easy to _say_ "Red Hat could easily have done both". -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
