Thanks Peter, I didn't know about the --checksig option of rpm. Mark
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Peter Kjellstrom > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 2:41 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] md5sum errors in rpms > > On Friday 29 February 2008, Hoy, Mark wrote: > > I just noticed that a couple of the updated RPMS have incorrect md5sums > > compared to the original email. > > I can't comment on this. > > > This exists on at least two mirrors: > > http://centos.take2hosting.com/5.1/updates/i386/RPMS/ > > http://altruistic.lbl.gov/mirrors/centos/5.1/updates/i386/RPMS/ > > > > # md5sum perl-* > > 7a3f9c4f7c35c23a0751f2b9fc196a21 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm > > 135fb1abc0f83fc85885b286ad268a7c > > perl-suidperl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm > > > > Is there a list of the md5sums for the entire updates directory? > > Even better, rpms have integrated checksums and signatures: > $ rpm --checksig perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm > perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK > > /Peter > > > Suggestions welcome. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
