On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 6:15 AM Steven Tardy <sjt5a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:13 PM Nicolas Kovacs <i...@microlinux.fr> wrote: > > > I'd be curious to have your input, since I'm fairly new to this sort of > > approach. > > > > This is the whole pets VS cattle choice. > > IMO each VM should have a singular use/purpose/app. VMs are effectively > free. And also prevents unintended negative upgrade interactions. > > Think through this to the logical end as each process is it’s own > environment/container/(docker) or each user execution is a unique instance > (serverless).
While my services are used by fewer people (and fewer in number), this is where my most recent server rebuild took me. i have been trying to use containers exclusively as it reduces the surface I have to maintain, assuming I can't find a trusted container source. Additionally, I am thinking ahead to the future where I hope that the OS will become available in a container-runner form where the surface is further reduced. My needs don't rise to the level of an OpenShift, but it sounds like yours may, especially given the WP instances. regards, bex > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Did this email arrive after work for you? Stop reading it and enjoy some work/life balance. Brian "bex" Exelbierd (he/him/his) Community Business Owner, RHEL Product Management @bexelbie | http://www.winglemeyer.org bexel...@redhat.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
