Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-29-2008 12:42 PM Ned Slider spake the following:
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:

This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:

http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853

that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about a workaround, but the upstream bug is blocked to mere mortals. is there a workaround other than just using the older kernel?


Did you see the added note?

I quote:

"For the benefit of those who do not have access to the upstream bugzilla report, this bug has been fixed in the updated 5.2 kernel (version number 2.6.18-92.el5), and this kernel also contains the CVE-2007-6282 patch. I would recommend that people affected by this bug upgrade to 2.6.18-92.el5."
Is that the kernel to be released with 5.2?

yes ... and we have it built already ... but I am not sure everything else that might need to go with it. module-init-tools and mkinitrd are also upgrades so those for sure

But rather than releasing pieces, I would think that using the older kernels on ipsec machines would be best for a couple weeks.




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to