On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Victor Padro wrote:
> >     isnt freenas also unionfs ?
> >
> > Yes it is.
>
> I would therefore pass on freenas, purely on that one point.
>
>
My HDs are not using UFS they're on Ext2


> Also, conder trimming your posts please
>

What does that mean, I'm not a native speaker so I didn't follow that,
sorry.
Didn't want to ofend or even make mistakes, my only point its that freenas
could do the job under a SMB enviroment.
And I don't even compare CentOS between FreeNAS in anything.


> --
> Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
"It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion."

"Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente
servidas"
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to