On Mon, August 25, 2008 11:21, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>Both NICs show up in the Xen hardware details display. >>Looking at dmesg output from rebooting the domU, I see both eth0 and eth1 >>appearing there. > > By chance did you set the macs manually? Are they valid, look for a typo? > I recall hearing about this behavior in lieu of that mistake.
I set the second one manually; copied the first one and added one. vif = [ "mac=00:16:3e:5b:44:5f,bridge=pubbr", "mac=00:16:3e:5b:44:60,bridge=virtbr" ] Interfaces are associated with both bridges properly, but only an eth0 device appears in the domU. If the low-order bits are magic in a MAC, then maybe my second one is an invalid, but I don't find any documentation of such; the low two bits of the *first* byte have meanings, but I haven't touched them. -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
