On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Rather than guessing, why not look at the output from the rpm command >> he ran, which gives the name of the package he's missing? Filipe >> nailed this one a little earlier in the thread with unifdef.x86_64 >> needing to be installed. > > I remember running into this a while back. That being the case, > shouldn't unifdef be included in kernel-devel, or at least one of the > packages that are required for building a kernel? Seems like it > sticks out like a sore thumb this way.... > > Alternatively, how do I go about suggesting this in a formal way > (bugzilla, etc.)?
Alan and I are now talking about this so we can amend the Wiki article appropriately. According to him, unifdef is not required on his 32-bit system. I will update on this subject as soon as I gather more info. Akemi _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
