David Hrbáč wrote: > Ralph Angenendt napsal(a): > > Yes, I'm seeing that too: > > > > Even if that is changed to UTC, it still is May 13th (and it doesn't explain > > why subsequent changelog entries are one day off, too. > > Thanks Ralph. Yes, it has nothing to do with time zone.
It has. I don't know why, yet. > I'm not sure if > I've seen it before last rpmbuild update. Also happens when you use *5.2* in mock to build the packages. And that has an older version of rpm. Watch and cry (I Cc: centos-devel, as I know that JBJ reads there, too). Please do answer in centos-devel, thanks. JBJ: Here's what happens: I take a src.rpm: [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$rpm -qp -...@hangelog canlock-2b-3.el5.src.rpm |head -2 * Tue May 19 2009 Ralph Angenendt <ra...@centos.org> -2b.2 - This is a test bump I rebuild it with rpmbuild: [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$rpmbuild --rebuild canlock-2b-3.el5.src.rpm [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$rpm -qp --changelog ../RPMS/x86_64/canlock-2b-3.el5.x86_64.rpm |head -2 * Tue May 19 2009 Ralph Angenendt <ra...@centos.org> -2b.2 - This is a test bump All is fine. Now let me churn it through mock. [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$mock -r centos-5-x86_64 --autocache canlock-2b-3.el5.src.rpm [...] [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$rpm -qp --changelog /var/lib/mock/centos-5-x86_64/result/canlock-2b-3.el5.x86_64.rpm |head -2 * Wed May 20 2009 Ralph Angenendt <ra...@centos.org> -2b.2 - This is a test bump Ummm? [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$date Tue May 19 13:19:25 CEST 2009 Yay! I invented a time machine! (or someone did). Okay, let's move the machine from Germany to the UK [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$sudo cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/London /etc/localtime [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$date Tue May 19 12:20:17 BST 2009 [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$rpm -qp --changelog /var/lib/mock/centos-5-x86_64/result/canlock-2b-3.el5.x86_64.rpm |head -2 * Tue May 19 2009 Ralph Angenendt <ra...@centos.org> -2b.2 - This is a test bump Hmmm. Who moved the international date line to the Channel? What about mock? Let's move the machine back to Germany first. [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$sudo cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Berlin /etc/localtime [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$date Tue May 19 13:22:08 CEST 2009 [angen...@shutdown SRPMS]$mock -r centos-5-x86_64 shell init mock-chroot> date Tue May 19 07:22:18 EDT 2009 So mock uses EDT which is 6 hours behind. Which does not explain why moving from BST (EDT +0500) still gives me the correct date in the changelog, moving the machine one step further to CEST (EDT +0600) moves me to the next day, though. What about the rpm built with rpmbuild? Let's move the machine to Sidney: [r...@shutdown etc]# cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/Australia/Sydney localtime [r...@shutdown etc]# date Tue May 19 21:27:50 EST 2009 [r...@shutdown etc]# rpm -qp --changelog /home/angenenr/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/canlock-2b-3.el5.x86_64.rpm * Tue May 19 2009 Ralph Angenendt <ra...@centos.org> -2b.2 - This is a test bump Strange. This is 8 hours in the future (and not 6), but still shows me the correct date. Something is not right here. Is this something to worry about? How and why does that happen? Why are there even calculations on the date line in a changelog? Cheers, Ralph
pgpKxQIWGywqr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
