Thanks
----- Original Message ---- > From: Karanbir Singh <mail-li...@karan.org> > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:46:15 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag > > On 06/29/2009 08:06 PM, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote: > > The whole point of the question is to make sure that Centos will remain > > 100% > binary compatible with PNAELV, at least in terms of package version. This > does > not mean that others will not have the ability to break this 100% binary > compatibility, at least in tersm of package version, by installing more > "up-to-date" packages from "extra repositories". > > yes. > > > By "extra repository(ies)" I mean any other repository that contains > > packages > which are not in PNAELV. > > yes again, and some of these 'extra repos' might be hosted within the > project itself. > > - KB > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
