Ned Slider wrote: > Benjamin Franz wrote: > >> Bob Hoffman wrote: >> >>> Been watching the bind thing for a few days and waiting for my daily yum to >>> update. >>> Finally did it by hand and got an interesting message. >>> >>> The python dependency killed my yum...lol. A quick look online and I see a >>> few thousand fedora and redhat issues with this python thing. Strange that >>> it is trying to install a package update only to find that package is not >>> there..... Yeesh >>> >>> But was able to run yum update bind and get the issues resolved. >>> >>> >>> --> Running transaction check >>> ---> Package python.x86_64 0:2.4.3-24.el5_3.6 set to be updated >>> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 for package: libxslt-python >>> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 for package: gamin-python >>> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 for package: libxml2-python >>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution >>> libxslt-python-1.1.17-2.el5_2.2.x86_64 from installed has depsolving >>> problems >>> --> Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package >>> libxslt-python-1.1.17-2.el5_2.2.x86_64 (installed) >>> libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems >>> --> Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package >>> libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.x86_64 (installed) >>> gamin-python-0.1.7-8.el5.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems >>> --> Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package >>> gamin-python-0.1.7-8.el5.x86_64 (installed) >>> Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package >>> libxslt-python-1.1.17-2.el5_2.2.x86_64 (installed) >>> Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package >>> libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.x86_64 (installed) >>> Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package >>> gamin-python-0.1.7-8.el5.x86_64 (installed) >>> >>> _ >>> >> Try doing: yum clean all && yum update >> >> That did it for me. >> >> Thanks goes to John R. Dennison for the fix. >> >> > > The "fix" has been available for a long time: > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0440.html >
I'm not sure that is the 'fix'. My systems were completely up-to-date as of last week so I should not have had a problem with that. And yet I did. -- Benjamin Franz _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
