From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 3, 2009 00:25 > From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 2, 2009 19:40 > > From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 19:34 > > > > > > If the box is the also the mx for the domain for which you want to > > > do special routing, I believe there will be a problem if you apply > > > that sender_based_routing patch. They cannot share the same > > > mailertable lookups. Another table lookup needs to be defined for > > > sender_based routing. > > > > > > I will see if I can cook up something on a Centos 4 box. > > > > Thanks for the offer but I would hold off for now. I am going to > > give the Smart Table solution a try first as it seems to be a > > little cleaner/easier/somethinger. > > I have done some initial testing of smarttable.m4 and have observed > positive results. It appears to perform as I hoped. I will do some > more extensive testing either tomorrow night or, more likely, over > the weekend. I will update this thread after I have had a chance to > complete the additional testing.
Hi All: We have been running the smartable.m4 code for the last three days and I have not been able to detect any problems. It seems that this code does handle the sender based routing quite well. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
