Steve Thompson wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote: > > >> I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a >> year ago? >> > > Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse is that > it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), and this is the latest version that > will run on it. And it's working fine (but it is really slow). The bloody > thing just won't die! It's going to have an accident, pretty soon, pretty > soon. > > Steve > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > Oooooops.... :D
But it's still nice to hear RHEL 2.1 is a resilient bastard - I guess this is what really adds value to the enterprise product. -- *Milos Blazevic* Cert. No: 605008720421478 Email: milos.blaze...@sbb.rs <mailto:milos.blaze...@sbb.rs> Tel: 064/301 45 78 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos