John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/03/10 11:31 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>> But then is ZFS a Cluster filesystem at all like GFS2/OCFS? Haven't
>> studied that angle as yet.
>
> its not. and, afaik, the linux implementation of ZFS is not very well
> supported, I certainly wouldn't commit to a project relying on it
> without a LOT of testing. ZFS is very stable on Solaris, and I
> understand its working quite well with FreeBSD
>
> Supposedly the new btfs for linux will be the choice. i'll remain
> skeptical of that until its proven itself in varied production
> environments by others.
I thought there was a small limit on the number of hard links in btfs - that
might make it unsuitable for general purpose use.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
