On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:46 PM, <m.r...@5-cent.us> wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > >> And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but > > > > Nobody in their right mind uses NIS+. Even Sun have stopped it. > > > > When I did Solaris 2.4 training NIS+ took 2 chapters of the manual. When > > I did Solaris 9 training it took 2 sentences. Yes, NIS+ may be more > > secure than NIS, but it's a FPOS to use properly and not a recommended > > solution. > > *shrug* I've never used it. Trust me, openLDAP is a royal PITA, but with > AD as an alternative.... > > mark > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >
Thanks... what is AD? I never even heard of that. I think we are going to LDAP at some point - due to its universality if for no other reason. Boris.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
