Lars Hecking wrote: > Nicolas Thierry-Mieg writes: >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Found this<http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/linux-amd64.html#java-sun>, and I >>> remember the plugins directory... except firefox 3.6.11, I can't find any, >>> not in ~/.mozilla, not in /usr/lib64/mozilla. Anyone have a clue for the >>> poor? >> >> that's strange: >> [nthie...@localhost ~]$ rpm -q firefox xulrunner >> firefox-3.6.11-2.el5.centos.x86_64 >> xulrunner-1.9.2.11-4.el5.x86_64 >> [nthie...@localhost ~]$ rpm -q firefox -R | grep xulrunner >> xulrunner>= 1.9.2.11-1 >> [nthie...@localhost ~]$ rpm -ql xulrunner | grep lib64/mozilla/plugins >> /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins >> y >> something's wrong with your system. > > Possibly. Or possibly not.
not sure what you mean by that? > On a closely related topic, can you comment on > whether or not it's a good idea to install the nspluginwrapper rpms on > x86_64? > They seem to be fundamentally broken. nspluginwrapper is for running 32-bit plugins in a 64-bit browser. Now that we have functional 64-bit flash and java plugins I don't see the need, but YMMV. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
