On 02/25/11 3:27 AM, ken wrote: > I read that. I would imagine that a lot of digital cameras-- in fact, a > lot of digital devices-- employ Linux in their firmware. If I were > writing code for an ARM processor, that's what I'd do. Why reinvent the > wheel? You'd think under the GPL they'd be required to divulge the > firmware code. And there should be a way to hack into these. But now > I'm going way OT.
the embedded device guys seem to get around that nowdays by offering the source as a generic kernel and util tarball and a tarball of their own code they consider GPL, which is almost never buildable without massive effort, and is usually very incomplete. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
