On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 04/12/2011 02:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> There are pages in the wiki that already describe what we are doing >>> right now. >> >> Really? Where do I look to see what has been tried with packages that are >> currently failing QA or not building yet? Or even what are the current >> time-consuming problems that haven't been solved yet? > > The process is not the product. > >>> The bug.centos.org site is open to anyone who might want to get involved >>> and help fix bugs. I'm guessing you are just new to CentOS and dont >>> really know what you are talking about. Try thinking things though for a >>> change. >> >> Wouldn't thinking things through have to result in distributing the time >> consuming work instead of making it wait for any single owner? > > Exactly, which is where the idea of 'ownership' comes through. >
How are you going to vet the stuff? The QA team will be responsible for that? For all the talk of giving others the exact tools to replicate a Centos distro - just how is the stuff produced by a zillion would be contributors (assuming they don't take off to build their own crap distro) going to be vetted? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
