On Thu, 19 May 2011, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> herrold earlier: >> and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that >> should have been in a dot zero release ... gee
> Which means, that RHEL6.0 should have just now come out today; the > release called 6.0 was a teaser and a beta of the release called 6.1 > which should have been called 6.0! There is an old piece of wisdom in IT to avoid the public 'dot zero' products so that some-one else gets to be the advance guard scout (you know, the one who staggers back to base camp, festooned wth arrows in him) even if a vendor names its initial product 2.1, or 3.0.3, it is still a 'dot zero' until eager and inadvertent public release (and perhaps unknowing) 'gamma testers' ('They CAN'T BE 'beta' testers -- we _did_ a beta') get fried a few times, a la Dr Bruce Banner and his Gamma ray accident -- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos