>> >> If you're running a database on it, you might re-think using a >> journaled filesystem. For that, ext2 will be faster and much >> less prone to unrecoverable data loss. > > Did you mean EXT4, or in actual fact EXT2? I thought EXT4 was faster than > EXT2? >
The optimum on an EXT basis for a filesystem that does not require journaling going forwards would be EXT4 with no journal... that way you get the benefit of extents etc without a journal slowing you down.... A better option than EXT2 ;) _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
