On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Don Krause <dkra...@optivus.com> wrote: > On Jul 14, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 04:53:11PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:32:14PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >>>> I've been asked for ideas on building a rather large archival storage >>>> system for inhouse use, on the order of 100-400TB. Probably using CentOS >>>> 6. The existing system this would replace is using Solaris 10 and >>>> ZFS, but I want to explore using Linux instead. >>>> >>>> We have our own tomcat based archiving software that would run on this >>>> storage server, along with NFS client and server. Its a write once, >>>> read almost never kind of application, storing compressed batches of >>>> archive files for a year or two. 400TB written over 2 years translates >>>> to about 200TB/year or about 7MB/second average write speed. The very >>>> rare and occasional read accesses are done by batches where a client >>>> makes a webservice call to get a specific set of files, then they are >>>> pushed as a batch to staging storage where the user can then browse >>>> them, this can take minutes without any problems. >>>> >>>> My general idea is a 2U server with 1-4 SAS cards connected to strings >>>> of about 48 SATA disks (4 x 12 or 3 x 16), all configured as JBOD, so >>>> there would potentially be 48 or 96 or 192 drives on this one server. >>>> I'm thinking they should be laid as as 4 or 8 or 16 seperate RAID6 sets >>>> of 10 disks each, then use LVM to put those into a larger volume. >>>> About 10% of the disks would be reserved as global hot spares. >>>> >>>> So, my questions... >>>> >>>> D) anything important I've neglected? >>>> >>> >>> Remember Solaris ZFS does checksumming for all data, so with weekly/monthly >>> ZFS scrubbing it can detect silent data/disk corruption automatically and >>> fix it. With a lot of data, that might get pretty important.. >>> >> >> Oh, and one more thing.. if you're going to use that many JBODs, >> pay attention to SES chassis management chips/drivers and software, >> so that you get the error/fault LEDs working on disk failure! >> >> -- Pasi > > > And make sure the assembler wires it all up correctly, I have a JBOD box, 16 > drives in a supermicro chassis, > where the drives are numbered left to right, but the error lights assume top > to bottom. > > The first time we had a drive fail, I opened the RAID management software, > clicked "Blink Light" on the failed drive, > pulled the unit that was flashing, and toasted the array. (Of course, NOW > it's RAID6 with hot spare so that won't happen anymore..) > > -- > Don Krause > "This message represents the official view of the voices in my head."
Which is why nobody should use RAID5 for anything other than test purposes :) -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
