On 08/31/2011 01:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Josh Miller wrote: >> On 08/31/2011 01:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote: >>> On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>>> Josh Miller wrote: >>>>> On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>>>>> Stephen Harris wrote: >>>>>>>> Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in >>>>>>>> eastern Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the >>>>>>>> Reply-To: in its spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some >>>> <snip> >>>>>>> Anyway, the SMTP server should send the delivery failure to the >>>>>>> envelope address, which may be different to both the From and >>>>>>> Reply-To addresses. > <snip> >> >> Why don't you use your SPF record to prevent spoofing (to most >> providers...)? >> >> > dig -t txt 5-cent.us >> ... >> 5-cent.us. 14400 IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx ptr >> include:hostmonster.com ?all" >> ... >> >> You have one but you're not using it to prevent spoofing. > > Um, because I'm not that deep into that? Thank you, I'll look at setting > that up. One question: is that in my registrar, or my hosting site? Given > it's an MX record, I'm guessing it's the former.
It's a DNS record. Hostmonster is authoritative for your domain, so you'll likely use them. -- Josh Miller Open Source Solutions Architect http://itsecureadmin.com/ _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
