From: Paras pradhan <pradhanpa...@gmail.com>

> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:17 PM, John R Pierce <pie...@hogranch.com> 
> wrote:
>>  On 09/23/11 12:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>  Paras pradhan wrote:
>>>>  >  Number  Start   End     Size   File system  Name
>>>>  >      Flags
>>>>  >    1      17.4kB  134MB   134MB               Microsoft 
> reserved
>>>>  >  partition  msftres
>>>>  >    2      135MB   134GB   134GB  ntfs         Basic data 
> partition
>>>>  >    3      134GB   1100GB  965GB               Basic data 
> partition
>>>  <snip>
>>>  Looks to me as though someone started to install Windows on top of your
>>>  box. This isn't partition data magically changed - best guess is 
> someone
>>>  started, then stopped, realizing it was the wrong box they were working
>>>  on.
>>  ay-yup, thats EXACTLY what it looks like.   a NEWER version of Windows
>>  at that.
> You mean the newer windows will create the partition schema as we are
> seeing it now? And you think its the automatic partitioning by windows
> if somebody has the access to this?

That looks lvery much ike my Windows laptop oem partitioning scheme...
1. The hidden boot partition for a recovery install
2. The main partition (ntfs)
3. The hidden recovery data partition

JD
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to