Lamar,

Thanks for the info.

Paras.


On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote:
> On Monday, September 26, 2011 11:18:06 AM Paras pradhan wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote:
>> > May I ask what sort of SAN?
>> Its a Hitachi OpenV fibre channel SAN (4Gbps HBA). My storage admin
>> checked if this LUN can be accessible by others and he found no other
>> hosts have access to it.
>
> Ok.
>
>> > I've seen some odd LUN reshuffling before,
> ...
>> reshuffling here means automatically changing disk's geometry as I am
>> having an issue? It would be interesting to know if this can happen.
>
> No, reshuffling as in a host gained access to LUNs in a 'phantom' manner that 
> it should not have had access to.  No longer a problem, and hasn't been for a 
> great while.  It was an odd interaction, but I forget the details.
>
> If another host were put onto the FC with the exact same WWN onto the fabric 
> it might be possible to see this sort of thing, too, but the WWN's are all 
> supposed to be unique.
>
>> Here are some new additional info :
> ...
>> So my question is: if the LUN has been re partitioned for ex: say to
>> install windows , why am i seeing our data in these newly created
>> partitions? Is it possible to see data in a reapportioned drive?
>
> Yes, it is.  If the recovery tool can look at the raw device it can grab 
> stuff that isn't in any partition, and you can look at that data.  Standard 
> forensics.  Repartitioning erases nothing except the partition table.
>
> Now, in the specific case of GPT, it is further possible to have a GPT and an 
> MBR at the same time, and while the 'shadow' MBR is supposed to match the 
> GPT's partitioning it doesn't have to.
>
> If you read through the LVM2 documentation and source code you may be able to 
> find the signature used to mark a partition as being LVM; once you do that 
> you should be able to find the start of the partition, and re-write the 
> partition table(s).  I use the plural there since with GPT you can have the 
> GPT and the MBR coexisting; ideally you'd want to wipe the GPT out, but in 
> reality you may not want to.
>
> But, being that you really don't want to write anything to this volume, you 
> really should set up an offset, read-only, loop device; that is, find the 
> starting sector of the partition (preferably an image of the LUN, and not the 
> actual LUN; can the Hitachi array do LUN replication (EMC's SANcopy or 
> Snapview or MirrorView being the rough equivalents)?).  Then, once you find 
> the starting position of the LVM physical volume:
>
> START_OFFSET_BYTE='actual starting sector number * sector size, zero origin'
> DEVLUN='LUN device, probably /dev/sde in your case'
> losetup -o $START_OFFSET_BYTE --read-only /dev/loop0 $DEVLUN
>
> Then see if you can get LVM to see this physical volume (by default loop 
> devices are included in the scan, but you may want to verify they're not 
> filtered in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf):
> pvscan
> vgscan
> lvscan
>
> You may be able to mount (-o ro of course) the LV at that point (I'm going 
> through the LVM business because you mentioned VG names in your post).
>
> Hope that helps.
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to