On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote: > > While finding the corner cases seems to be your specialty, Les, recognize > that there will always be a corner case not covered by any filesystem > labeling/naming scheme, no matter what scheme is used. >
I've found that it is a good idea to find concepts and implementations that weren't very well thought out before they bite you somewhere, so yes, I do go out of my way. For example when mounting by label was first implemented, having a duplicate label (very likely if you move disks around at all since the installer always used the same labels) would keep the system from booting at all. You had to just say 'what were they thinking...' - and wonder about the rest of the system. > It's not at all hard to change the labels after the install. To what? It's something that is going to hold some data in the future. And you may not know you need to re-mount it until the machine that labeled it is gone or dead and the drive is all that is left. Within 5.x I've found auto-assembled md devices to be pretty reliable at identifying themselves, but booting the 6.x livecd completely messed that up on the one machine where I tried it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos