On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Patrick Lists
<centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>> How is, say, being
>> required to pay a license fee as a consequence different from losing
>> something you have already contracted and paid for?
>
> It would surprise me if Red Hat would not refund the customer or let
> them ride out the term of what they have already paid for. And didn't
> the customer agree to Red Hat's terms (AUP) when they signed the contract?
The question is, how can a contract containing restrictions on what
you can do with GPL covered content not invalidate your own right to
redistribute, given that the GPL prohibits additional restrictions?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
