On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 11:24:24 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> If, in fact, you cannot rebuild a src rpm and get a working
>> copy then in that respect you might as well be using closed,
>> proprietary software.
>
> "Working" and "binary compatible" are two different things, and typically the
> 100% binary compatibility is most important for precompiled things and for
> closed source things.
But we are talking about working here.
> In the SOgo case, a recompile on the target box fixed the issue and resulted
> in a 'working' binary. But it very possibly would not be 100% compatible
> with the same exact binary built from the same source code on a slightly
> different base.
Try the other way around: build RHEL from their src rpms, try to run
the 3rd party binary... I thought you said that didn't work. If you
can't rebuild that source so it works, you might as well not use open
source.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
