On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Bill Campbell wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011, Lamar Owen wrote: >> On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 01:46:57 AM Bob Hoffman wrote: >>> Personally I am thinking of staying away from all red hat clones due to >>> redhat's actions for my own security. >>> The only thing on the horizon I see is ubuntu server as best supported >>> and up to date. >> >> There are really two good enterprise-grade alternatives, in my opinion, one >> free and one not: >> 1.) SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES); > > We were using that about 5 years ago, and paid Novell a fair amount of > money in their Partner program. Novell's support was slim to non-existent > leading to our move to CentOS. > > Given the recent sale to Attachmate and such, I wouldn't invest any time or > money in SLES. ---- I gave up on any notion of SLES long before then.
Also, the one time I actually requested any kind of support from an RHEL entitlement, it took them the full 48 hours to get back to me with an answer which I solved myself about about 2 hours after I asked - so yeah, CentOS seemed to be enough for me. With Ubuntu, you do actually have access to incident level support I guess - not that I am likely to ever use it. Craig _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
