Vreme: 12/17/2011 05:43 AM, Mike Burger piše: > Hi, Matt. > > Sorry for the top post, but my iPad mail client seems averse to allowing me > to bottom post. > > Just wanted to take a moment to note that I believe you've got things a > little bit reversed. > > The use Of the route-ethX files and the "ip" command are the "newer" method. > Setting the NETMASK and ADDRESS in the ifcfg-ethX files has always been and > continues to be the norm. Having the GATEWAY field in either the ifcfg-ethX > files or in /etc/sysconofig/network is the older way of setting the default > route. > > You're right, though...it was certainly less flexible. ;-) > > On Dec 15, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Matt Garman<matthew.gar...@gmail.com> wrote: >
No, you got it wrong, he was talking about that route-ethX, not ifcfg-ethX, supports NETMASK, ADDRESS, GATEWAY (in separate lines) format. I used it from 2006. You can add as much routes that way as you please: NETMASK0= ADDRESS0= GATEWAY0= NETMASK1= ADDRESS1= GATEWAY1= NETMASK2= ADDRESS2= GATEWAY2= ... -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
