Frank Cox wrote: >> Gimme a trick: How to unregister an implicit but formally unavailable >> runtime dependency in a spec file? > > I've given you the solution twice. Here is a more detailed description of the > exact lines that you need to edit in the spec file: > > http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-depend-manual-dependencies.html
We are talking about different things: My stuff is linked against 'libfoo'. When the package is finally build, it records this depedency because of that. Now this package requires libfoo to be installed. It's there but not registered with rpm! That's what I want to get rid of. Something like 'Unrequire' perhaps. Or another trick: IIRC, at some time taking the x bit from libs achieved that, but it's not working anymore since quite some time. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
