On 03/10/2012 06:48 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Mar 10, 2012, at 7:14 PM, Keith wrote: > >> On 11/03/12 02:49, Phil Savoie wrote: >>> ---> Package xulrunner.i686 0:1.9.2.26-2.el6.centos will be updated >>> --> Processing Dependency: libmozjs.so for package: >>> gxine-0.5.905-1.el6.rf.i686 >>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution >>> Error: Package: gxine-0.5.905-1.el6.rf.i686 (@rpmforge) >>> Requires: libmozjs.so >>> Removing: xulrunner-1.9.2.26-2.el6.centos.i686 (@updates) >>> libmozjs.so >>> Updated By: xulrunner-10.0.1-2.el6.centos.i686 (updates) >>> Not found >>> Available: xulrunner-1.9.2.24-2.el6.centos.1.i686 (base) >>> libmozjs.so >>> Available: xulrunner-1.9.2.26-1.el6.centos.i686 (updates) >>> libmozjs.so >>> >> Have you configured Priorities? >> I've mainly found these sorts of issues to be related with priorities >> not configured - may not be your case, but I would double check anyway. > In this specific case, and while this isn't the RPMforge list, but, anyway, > it appears that the update of xulrunner (associated with the new Firefox, I > believe) no longer provides some specific library that the rpmforge gxine > package depends upon, and thus yum couldn't do the upgrade of xulrunner > because the new package doesn't seem to provide that dependency any more. I > of course reserve the right to be wrong. > > It's not something that can be fixed by CentOS, it will have to be fixed by > rpmforge, as that gxine package will have to be upgraded to use something > else that provides libmozjs.so. (that's where the 'Not found' under the > xulrunner 10.0.1 package comes from).
That is how I see it too ... maybe they can just recompile that program against the new xulrunner.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
