On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM, <m.r...@5-cent.us> wrote:
>> <snip>
>> Still, I'd have to agree with m.roth: parted(8) has a...um...classical
>> UI. It's not far advanced beyond the ex(1) school of UI design.
>
> I disagree. I don't think it's advanced beyond that school....
>
Yes, it is so bad that it is surprising that there is not a text-mode
program that performs the functions of gparted - or is there one?
That is, something that gives you a fill-in-the-form setup with
reasonable defaults, then runs parted (and maybe mklabel, mkfs, etc.)
for you. Do we really need to run X for that?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
