On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote:
>
> 1.) EPEL doesn't make it a priority (or even a goal) to work well with any 
> other third-party repository;

True enough as a fact, but it sort-of sounds like a criticism for
something that's not really practical.  Normally packages would be
accepted into EPEL if they meet the guidelines and there is usually
some reason if they are elsewhere.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to