Hi guys, Could you be so kind to trim those quotes a little?
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:40 -0400, Cal Webster wrote: > Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems > here. > As with all the other tests, I only replaced the > tigervnc-server-module > package on each host. Something in the bug report struck me as odd: The original report is from May 9th. Checking Red Hat's FTP I see there is a more recent SRPM than the one you are discussing. ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/tigervnc-1.0.90-0.15.20110314svn4359.el6_1.1.src.rpm Seems like this update wasn't picked up even though it's two months old, and the previous (current) one was rebuilt three months after it was released by upstream. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
