On Dec 27, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Ibrahim Yurtseven wrote: > [global] > workgroup = NETZWERK > server string = Samba Server Version %v > security = SHARE > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 50 > cups options = raw > > [public] > comment = hier kannn reinkopiert werden > path = /data/public > read only = No > create mask = 0777 > guest only = Yes > guest ok = Yes > sh-4.1# cat /etc/samba/smbusers > # Unix_name = SMB_name1 SMB_name2 ... > root = administrator admin > nobody = guest pcguest smbguest > sh-4.1# ls -lisah /data/public > total 144M > 1703938 12K drwxrwxrwx. 4 nobody users 12K Dec 27 13:39 . > 1703937 4.0K drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4.0K Dec 22 19:43 .. > 1706985 144M -rwxrw-rw- 1 nobody nobody 144M Dec 27 13:39 > Disney_ Alice im Wunderland (1951).mp4 ---- perhaps testparam -sv would have been more useful/explicit just to confirm the default values are what you believe them to be but…
assuming that: ls -ld /data/ ls -ld /data/public are rwxrwxrwx (or something that permits user 'nobody') you might want to ensure that 'guest account = nobody' is specifically set in the global section. I have no experience with 'security = share' and tend to use 'security = user' and with this setup, I think you can use 'map to bad user' to achieve something similar but I suspect that you can make it work. The concept of security = share is to mimic Windows 95/98 file sharing mode which requires only a password. I don't know that it is well supported by Windows Vista, 7 or 8 clients. Craig _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
