Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:49 AM, <m.r...@5-cent.us> wrote: >>> >>>> Reminds me of the *only* O'Reilly book I didn't like: I think it was >>>> Larry's original book on Perl - the index was *dreadful*, couldn't >>>> find anything. >>> >>> On the other hand, if you wrote a perl program following those >>> examples, it would almost certainly still run today, with the only >>> change it might need being to escape @ symbols that you had in >>> double-quoted strings. That's pretty rare. >> >> Well, yes. And I can do the same with my favorite language of all, ANSI >> C. > > Umm, yeah - now. In 1987 when perl was released you'd have been using > K&R C which needed some changes when compilers started demanding the > syntax from the ANSI changes. Or worse, some compiler with it's own > unique syntax.
True... but in '87, I was still on mainframes, and using *GAG* DOS/VSE/SP (and whatever letters have been added since). I didn't get to use C until '89, and perl... no one had heard of it were I was working in TX until about '92 or '93. Yes, I did start with K&R, and have my copy of the Bible (K&R, ANSI version). Syntax on languages shouldn't change, anyway.... mark _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos