On 07/03/2013 08:34 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Tue, July 2, 2013 17:34, John Hinton wrote:
>
> Ditto here, and for the same reasons.
>
> This was our experience as well; changing userids between clam and
> clamav between updates caused us a lot of avoidable headaches. We
> switched to epel for clamav because of that one issue. Otherwise we
> have been very pleased with rpmforge. It will prove a great loss if
> there is a serious possibility that this resource might fade away.
>
>
Fading away is a distinct possibility.
David Hrbac, who is trying to maintain rpmforge had this to say on that
subject.
"And of course, there's still a question about the Repoforge. Do we
really want it? Isn't a time for Epel to replace Repoforge? I still want
to keep Repoforge alive bud have no replies from Dag."
Pete
--
Unencumbered by the thought process.
-- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
