On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, SilverTip257 wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Eliezer Croitoru <elie...@ngtech.co.il>wrote: > >> OK so back to the issue in hands. >> The issue is that I have a mail storage for more then 65k users per >> domain and the ext4 doesn't support this size of directory list. >> The reiser FS indeed fits for the purpose but ext4 doesn't even start to >> scratch it. >> Now the real question is that: >> What FS will you use for dovecot backhand to store a domain with more >> then 65k users? >> > > XFS? > Used for situations where one has "lots or large" as Dave Chinner says [0] > Meaning lots of files or large files. > > [0] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3IreQHLELU > > >> >> Eliezer >> >> On 07/05/2013 04:45 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >>> I was learning about the different FS exists. >>> I was working on systems that ReiserFS was the star but since there is >>> no longer support from the creator there are other consolidations to be >>> done. >>> I want to ask about couple FS options. >>> EXT4 which is amazing for one node but for more it's another story. >>> I have heard about GFS2 and GlusterFS and read the docs and official >>> materials from RH on them. >>> In the RH docs it states the EXT4 limit files per directory is 65k and I >>> had a directory which was pretty loaded with files and I am unsure >>> exactly what was the size but I am almost sure it was larger the 65k >>> files per directory. >>> >>> I was considering using GlusterFS for a very large storage system with >>> NFS front. >>> I am still unsure EXT4 should or shouldn't be able to handle more then >>> 16TB since the linux kernel ext4 docs at: >>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt in >> section 2.1 >>> it states: * ability to use filesystems > 16TB (e2fsprogs support not >>> available yet). >>> so can I use it or not?? if there are no tools to handle this size then >>> I cannot trust it. >>> >>> I want to create a storage with more then 16TB based on GlusterFS since >>> it allows me to use 2-3 rings FS which will allow me to put the storage >>> in a form of: >>> 1 client -> HA NFS servers -> GlusterFS cluster. >>> >>> it seems to more that GlusterFS is a better choice then Swift since RH >>> do provide support for it. >>> >>> Every response will be appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Eliezer
Just for interest I have had two 44TB "raid 6" arrays using EXT4, running with heavy useage 24/7 on el6 now since January 2013 without any problems so far. I rebuilt "e2fsprogs" from source. Something along the lines below looking at my notes. wget http://atoomnet.net/files/rpm/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs-1.42.6-1.el6.src.rpm yum-builddep e2fsprogs-1.42.6-1.el6.src.rpm rpmbuild --rebuild --recompile e2fsprogs-1.42.6-1.el6.src.rpm cd /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 rpm -Uvh *.rpm ###### build array with a partition ####### parted /dev/sda mkpart primary ext4 1 -1 mkfs.ext4 -L sraid1v -E stride=64,stripe-width=384 /dev/sda1 ###### build array without a partition ####### mkfs.ext4 -L sraid1v -E stride=64,stripe-width=384 /dev/sda Maybe this will help someone. Cheers Steve -- Dr Stephen Brooks http://www-solar.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/ Solar MHD Theory Group Tel :: 01334 463735 Fax :: 01334 463748 E-mail :: ste...@mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk --------------------------------------- Mathematical Institute North Haugh University of St. Andrews St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS SCOTLAND --------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos