On 2013-10-27 @19:24 zulu, Jim Perrin scribed: > I'm glad this worked for you, but this is quite possibly the most > horrific way to put chrome on a system. This script pulls in packages > that no longer get updated, abuses LD_PRELOAD, builds as root, and quite > possibly consumes raw orphaned kittens. > > This script should be classified as a criminal offense. >
On 2013-06-26 @13:03 zulu, Johnny Hughes scribed: > With the very real possibility that new code could be written (for the > newer glibc/gcc that they are now targeting) that will actually not > compile on the older setup, I am not sure we are comfortable actually > moving this directly into extras. > > I would say that we need several cycles and new versions for testing > (maybe at the 31.x tree cycle) before we actually know this is going to > continue to work. > > WRT PDFs and flash, I would not use the older versions but instead try > to make adobereader and adobeflash if they fail ... otherwise you will > not get security updates on these. > > Thanks, > Johnny Hughes What I posted should confirm that the GLIB/GCC files from the f15 repo have continued to work (actually, Chrome was at v28.x when I ran that script)... so why can't the current Chrome be built for the extras repo? Thanks. :) _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
