On 06/02/14 16:26, Phelps, Matt wrote: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Robert Arkiletian <rob...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> new potential remote code exploit in Chromium flash. >> http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.ca/2014/02/stable-channel-update.html >> >> Doesn't look like these repos are being updated. >> http://people.redhat.com/tpopela/rpms/ >> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/ >> >> Any info on this issue would be welcome. >> > > > Yes, please. Can the CentOS folks check with their newly minted Red Hat > brethren on this issue? > > This is getting critical for us. We have over a hundred CO6 desktops that > are currently running an insecure version of chromium. The security people > are all over us on this! > > We need to run chrome/chromium in order to manage our Google Apps for > Government deployment (for over 1000 users). It doesn't work right with > firefox. > > If we need to apply pressure elsewhere, please let us know where to direct > our fury. >
... to Google ? (especially because it's *their* browser to support *their* Google Apps ....) -- Fabian Arrotin gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
