On 09/16/2011 12:25 PM, Jim Schutt wrote: > David Sterba wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:44:09AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote: >>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Liu Bo wrote: >>>> On 09/11/2011 05:47 AM, Martin Mailand wrote: >>>>> Hi >>>>> I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd, >>>>> kernel ist 3.1.0-rc5. >>>>> >>>> Have posted a patch for this: >>>> >>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131547325515336&w=2 >>> We're still seeing this with -rc6, which includes 98c9942 and 65450aa. >> >> Me too, for the >> WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5711 >> btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x180/0x350 [btrfs]() >> > > FWIW, I'm seeing a slightly different case, while testing branch > integration/btrfs-next (commit 2828cbd9620e03) from > git://repo.or.cz/linux-2.6/btrfs-unstable.git merged into branch > master (commit c455ea4f122d21) from git://github.com/torvalds/linux.git >
Ah yeah sorry I see what's going on here, I just missed a few places we call run_delayed_refs() where we can still have trans->block_rsv set. I will fix this and send a patch soon. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
