Josh Durgin wrote: > On 02/03/2012 10:19 AM, Josh Pieper wrote: > >I have a Windows 7 guest running under kvm/libvirt with RBD as a > >backend to a cluster of 3 OSDs. With this setup, I am seeing behavior > >that looks suspiciously like disk corruption in the guest VM executing > >some of our workloads. > > > >For instance, in one occurance, there is a python function that > >recursively deletes a large directory tree while the disk is otherwise > >loaded. For us, this occasionally fails because the OS reported that > >all the files in the directory were deleted, but then reports the > >directory is not empty when going to remove it. In another, a simple > >test application writes new files to a directory every 50ms, then > >after 6s verifies that at least 3 files were written, also while the > >disk is under heavy load. > > > >We have never ever seen these failures on bare metal, or on kvm > >instances backed by a LVM volume in years of operation, but they > >happen every couple of hours with RBD. Unfortunately, I have been > >unsuccessful when attempting to create synthetic test cases to > >demonstrate the inconsistent RBD behavior. > > > >Has anyone else seen similar inconsistent RBD behavior, or have ideas > >how to diagnose further? > > What fs are your osds using? A while ago there was a bug in ext4's > fiemap that sometimes caused incorrect reads - if you set > filestore_fiemap_threshold larger than your object size, you can test > whether fiemap is the problem.
The OSDs are using xfs. In my testing with 0.40, btrfs had incredible performance problems after a day or so of operation. The last I heard, ext4 could potentially have data loss due to its limited xattr support. > Are you using the rbd_writeback_window option? If so, does the > corruption occur without it? Yes I was. In prior tests, performance was abysmal without it. I will test without it, but our runs will load the system very differently when they are going so slowly. > In any case, a log of this occurring with debug_ms=1 and > debug_rbd=20 from qemu will tell us if there are out-of-order > operations happening. Great, I will attempt to record some. Regards, Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
