On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Andrey Korolyov <and...@xdel.ru> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Guido Winkelmann
> <guido-c...@thisisnotatest.de> wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 11. September 2012, 17:25:49 schrieben Sie:
>>> The next stable release will have cephx authentication enabled by default.
>>
>> Hm, that could be a problem for me. I have tried multiple times to get cephx
>> working in the past, without lasting success. (I cannot recall at the moment
>> what the problem was the last time around, but it was probably qemu/libvirt.)
>
> BTW, libvirt 0.10.x has a broken cephx support somehow. It forms same
> string for -drive as 0.9x(at least in a log) but failing to pass
> authentication same moment.
>
Please nevermind, I have build incorrect regex for log parsing previously.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-September/msg00082.html
>>
>> IMHO, the documentation badly needs a high-level overview for cephx (or maybe
>> I just haven't found it yet); what it does, what dangers it protects you from
>> and how it achieves that.
>>
>>         Guido
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to