On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Loic Dachary <l...@dachary.org> wrote: > Hi Neil, > > On 03/06/2013 08:27 PM, Neil Levine wrote: >> I think the multi-site RGW stuff is somewhat orthogonal to OpenStack > > Even when keystone is involved ?
Good question. Yehuda: how would the asynchronously replicated user metadata interact with Keystone? >> Who approves the session at ODS and when is this decision made? > > I suspect Josh knows more than I do about this. During the cinder meeting > earlier today J. Griffith said that if the nova track is too busy to host the > "Roadmap for Ceph integration with OpenStack" session he was in favor of > having it in the cinder track. Following his advice I suggested to Thierry > Carrez to open a "Cross project" track ( > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-March/006365.html ) I don't think Cinder is such a bad place for it to be as presumably the interaction to copy the block device to a secondary location would be triggered through a Cinder API call no? Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
