Hi Alexandre,

Am 24.05.2013 um 17:37 schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER <aderum...@odiso.com>:

> Hi,
> 
> For Proxmox, we have made some patchs to split the savevm process,
> 
> to be able to save the memory to an external volume. (and not the current 
> volume).
> 
> For rbd, we create a new rbd volume to store the memory.
> 
> qemu patch is here :
> https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-qemu-kvm.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/internal-snapshot-async.patch;h=c67a97ea497fe31ff449acb79e04dc1c53b25578;hb=HEAD
> 
> ----- Mail original -----
> 

wow, sounds very interesting, being on the road for the next 3 days I will have 
a closer look next week.

Thnx n regards,

Oliver.

> De: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@42on.com>
> À: "Oliver Francke" <oliver.fran...@filoo.de>
> Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Envoyé: Vendredi 24 Mai 2013 17:08:35
> Objet: Re: qemu-1.5.0 savevm error -95 while writing vm with ceph-rbd as 
> storage-backend
> 
> On 05/24/2013 09:46 AM, Oliver Francke wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> with a running VM I encounter this strange behaviour, former
>> qemu-versions don't show up such an error.
>> Perhaps this comes from the rbd-backend in qemu-1.5.0 in combination
>> with ceph-0.56.6? Therefore my
>> crosspost.
>> 
>> Even if I have no real live-snapshot avail - they know of this
>> restriction -, it's more work for the customers
>> to perform a shutdown before the wonna do some changes to their VM ;)
>> 
> 
> Doesn't Qemu try to save the memory state to RBD here as well? That
> doesn't work and fails.
> 
>> Any hints welcome,
>> 
>> Oliver.
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Wido den Hollander
> 42on B.V.
> 
> Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
> Skype: contact42on
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to