Am 17.10.2013 22:29, schrieb Andrew Woodward: > We need to have a reasonable license on this preferably Apache 2.0. > the enovance module is AGPL which can't come in contact with nearly > anything with out causing massive license issues. Starting with any of > the enovance code is a Non-starter as it will require the AGPL > License.
I agree with the Apache license. Would it be an option to ask enovance (and the contributers) to relicense under Apache v2.0? I would be happy to do that for my contributions. Danny -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html