Am 17.10.2013 22:29, schrieb Andrew Woodward:
> We need to have a reasonable license on this preferably Apache 2.0.
> the enovance module is AGPL which can't come in contact with nearly
> anything with out causing massive license issues. Starting with any of
> the enovance code is a Non-starter as it will require the AGPL
> License.

I agree with the Apache license.

Would it be an option to ask enovance (and the contributers) to
relicense under Apache v2.0? I would be happy to do that for my
contributions.

Danny


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to